Welcome to another edition of NoFluffSecurity, the newsletter that cuts straight to the point—no hype, no fluff, just the cybersecurity insights you need. Whether you're a seasoned pro or new to the game, we’re here to help you stay ahead of threats and keep your clients, products, and services secure.

We don’t just serve up the facts; we dish out our unfiltered take on what’s happening in the industry. No sugar-coating, no scare tactics—just actionable advice that actually matters. What you do with it? That’s on you. But if you're here, you already know the stakes.

Before you enjoy this week’s dose of clarity, make sure to click that subscribe button if you haven’t already. You won’t want to miss our next issue!

Feature Story: AI – Driving Innovation, Amplifying Risk

The integration of AI into cybersecurity has sparked immense innovation, but it has also expanded the attack surface in unprecedented ways. AI is increasingly used for both defensive and offensive operations, making it a key factor in the evolution of cyber threats. Recent discoveries, such as the critical vulnerability in NVIDIA's AI infrastructure and the use of generative AI (GenAI) to automate malware like AsyncRAT, highlight how AI can be exploited by adversaries to bypass security measures and amplify risks. The Nvidia vulnerability, where improper container management led to potential exploitation, reveals how AI systems can expose significant security gaps when security is not considered at every development stage.

Moreover, AI-powered disinformation campaigns, including deepfakes targeting political figures, are becoming more prevalent, adding layers of complexity to already-challenging security environments. These campaigns are pushing the boundaries of traditional cybersecurity defenses, forcing organizations to rethink how they protect both their AI systems and the broader infrastructure they interact with.

Internal risks tied to AI misuse are also growing. A recent report indicated that one-third of employees are sharing work-related information through unsecured channels, increasing the potential for insider threats and data leakage. This highlights a disconnect between the rapid adoption of AI tools and a comprehensive understanding of their security and privacy implications. AI is no longer just a technological advancement—it’s a critical vulnerability that requires continuous oversight as its role in enterprise environments grows.

NoFluff's Take: AI – A Security Revolution We Can’t Seem To Control

AI is often touted as the future of innovation, but in the rush to deploy it, organizations are missing crucial security steps. The NVIDIA vulnerability is a stark reminder that even advanced systems can be left vulnerable if security is not baked into the design process from the start. While AI can offer immense benefits in automating processes and detecting threats, it’s becoming clear that attackers are also leveraging AI to create more sophisticated and scalable threats, such as automated malware like AsyncRAT or deepfake-driven disinformation campaigns.

Additionally, the internal misuse of AI by employees presents another layer of risk. Employees using AI-powered tools without fully understanding the security implications are creating new vulnerabilities for their organizations. The relentless pursuit of convenience and productivity through AI is blurring the lines between operational efficiency and security risk, and unless organizations prioritize AI security from day one, they will face a growing backlog of vulnerabilities to patch and manage in the future.

#AIsecurity #GenerativeAI #DeepfakeThreats #CybersecurityInnovation

References

1. Wiz.io: Critical NVIDIA AI Vulnerability

2. DarkReading: GenAI Writes Malicious Code, Spreading AsyncRAT

3. SecurityWeek: AI-Backed Operation Targeting Senator Points to Deepfake Future

4. InfoSecurity Magazine: Third of Employees Sharing Work Information via Risky Services

Breaking News

Millions of Kia Cars Vulnerable to Remote Hacking

Researchers uncovered vulnerabilities in Kia's web portal, potentially allowing attackers to remotely control key vehicle functions. By exploiting flaws in Kia’s API and backend systems, attackers could use just a car’s license plate to unlock doors, start the engine, and even track the car’s location. The issues, which affected millions of Kia vehicles manufactured since 2013, also exposed sensitive personal information such as the car owner's name, address, and contact details. The vulnerabilities were reported to Kia in June 2024, and a fix was implemented in August. During the testing phase, researchers demonstrated how attackers could take control of these cars within 30 seconds using a proof-of-concept (PoC) tool they developed, emphasizing the severity of the flaws.

NoFluff's Take: Exposing the Fragility of Connected Cars

The increasing connectivity of modern vehicles brings with it serious security implications. This isn't just about convenience anymore—it's about control, and who has it. The Kia vulnerability highlights a much bigger issue: automakers are rushing to integrate connected services without fully considering the security risks. The fact that such significant flaws allowed remote control with just a license plate number should be a wake-up call for the entire automotive industry. The push for digital transformation in cars must be matched by a push for robust, secure-by-design systems. Relying on external APIs without sufficient testing leaves gaping holes in vehicle security, and in cases like this, the stakes are literally life and death.

CISO Takeaways

• Supply Chain Vulnerabilities: This case underscores the importance of managing third-party risks. APIs, often provided by external vendors, can introduce significant vulnerabilities into a company’s infrastructure. CISOs must ensure that third-party integrations are scrutinized rigorously and security testing is ongoing.

• Incident Response: The 2-month window between vulnerability disclosure and resolution shows the need for faster response times. CISOs should prioritize establishing clear communication and rapid patching processes with partners to reduce exposure periods.

Security Engineer Thoughts

• API Security: This highlights the critical importance of implementing strong authentication and access controls on APIs. Securing APIs, especially those that interact with sensitive systems like vehicles, should be a top priority.

• Proactive Testing: Engineers should integrate regular, automated security testing into development pipelines, especially for IoT and connected systems, to catch these vulnerabilities early before they are exploited in the wild.

#APIsecurity #IoTSecurity #AutomotiveCybersecurity

References

1. SecurityWeek: Millions of Kia Cars Were Vulnerable to Remote Hacking

Latest Research

Parsing the Complexities of Email Security

Researchers have identified email parsing vulnerabilities that allow attackers to bypass security controls by exploiting inconsistencies in how different systems interpret email addresses. Meanwhile, email remains a prime target for phishing, business email compromise (BEC), and malware, as noted in the broader exploration of email’s evolution as a critical communication tool. Despite billions of dollars invested in email security solutions, the threat landscape continues to evolve, requiring a more comprehensive approach to securing email beyond just endpoint detection.

NoFluff’s Take: Email’s Unsolved Problem

Email has always been a weak link in cybersecurity, primarily because the standards it was built on weren't designed for modern threats. The ability to manipulate parsing inconsistencies, as demonstrated by researchers, shows how attackers are exploiting the structural limitations of email. While solutions like Secure Email Gateways and Domain-based Messaging Authentication (DMARC) help, they often tackle the symptoms rather than the root causes. Email is not just a communication tool—it's now a combination of an identity provider and a data store. Until email is treated as part of a broader identity and data security framework, these vulnerabilities will persist.

CISO Takeaways

• Holistic Email Security: CISOs should advocate for comprehensive security that goes beyond spam filters and Secure Email Gateways, focusing on email's role in identity management and collaboration.

• Vulnerability Auditing: Conduct regular audits for email parsing vulnerabilities across the organization to ensure all systems interpret email addresses consistently and securely.

Security Engineer Thoughts

• Parser Hardening: Engineers should ensure that email parsing libraries are up-to-date and consistently configured across all systems to prevent bypass attacks.

• Collaboration Protection: It’s critical to extend email security measures to include other collaboration tools like cloud-based file shares, ensuring that sensitive data is protected across platforms.

#EmailSecurity #Phishing #ParserVulnerabilities #IdentitySecurity

References

1. PortSwigger: Splitting the Email Atom

2. Return on Security: The Evolution of Email Security

Tools

Whitespots Security Requirements Generator

OWASP ASVS (Application Security Verification Standard) was created to provide a standardized framework that helps developers and organizations ensure they are implementing adequate security controls in their applications, addressing the common challenge of inconsistent or incomplete security practices across software development projects.

To that end, it provides a set of security requirements and guidelines designed to help developers build more secure applications by establishing standard security controls and practices across different levels of application development.

That was the good part. On the downside, the typical challenge with leveraging OWASP ASVS is that it provides a vast, detailed set of security requirements that can be overwhelming for developers, especially those without extensive security expertise. This complexity often leads to confusion about where to focus and how to implement the controls effectively.

Whitespots Security Requirements Generator is a practical tool designed to help developers manage and implement security requirements. It simplifies the process by breaking down complex security frameworks like OWASP ASVS into actionable tasks that fit directly into your development cycle. The tool prioritizes security controls and maps them to the relevant parts of your application, making it easier to ensure critical vulnerabilities are addressed early.

NoFluff's Take: Practical Security for Development Teams

Whitespots goes beyond simply listing generic security requirements by creating a custom, data-driven security requirements document based on the actual project being developed. This feature tailors the security controls to the specifics of the application, allowing developers to focus on the most relevant security measures for their project, rather than relying on a generic checklist. This tailored approach ensures that the security controls are directly aligned with the application's architecture and use case, making the security process more efficient and applicable to real-world scenarios.

Actionable Takeaway: Start using Whitespots during the initial stages of development to generate and track security requirements as you build. It’s a useful way to ensure you’re addressing critical security areas without overwhelming your workflow.

#OWASP #AppSec #SecurityAutomation #DevSecOps

References

1. Whitespots: Security Requirements Generator 

If you’re not already one of our regulars then that Subscribe button below has your name on it ;) See you next week!

All views and opinions expressed therein are solely the authors’ own and do not reflect those of any employers past or present.

NoFluffSec is a Bitsavant LLC publication